I said Matt Williams was going to bumble them out of any chance of winning anything, and I was right.
Jeff Passan goes in hella hard on Williams here.
The reigning NL Manager of the Year hasn't acquitted himself as much of a tactician in his year and a half on the job, and his performance over the weekend did nothing to sway his reputation otherwise. It was bad enough that two unnecessary intentional walks backfired Saturday. Parking Storen and Papelbon in the bullpen for the entire series showed a troublesome adherence to standard principles more open-minded managers long ago ignored.It's funny - Williams comes off so well when you hear him talk. He seems competent, and he uses really big words, especially for a major league manager. I think I heard him say "obstreperous" in a pregame interview once.
I'm sure that's how he got the job. Mike Rizzo already liked him, and I bet he aced the interview. "Sure, he's never managed before, but he was a really good player, and he said 'ebullient'! And 'abjure'! He even used them correctly. As far as I know."
But it's one thing to sound like a smartypants fancy lad when Charlie Slowes and Dave Jageler and lobbing softballs at you; it's quite another thing to run a baseball team successfully.
Williams can't do it, and it's too bad, and we're pretty much screwed. Even if the Nats do recover from this weekend's disaster and win the division - which is more likely than not - he's going to run into a much better manager in the playoffs and get styled on.
If the Nats don't make the playoffs, at least he's fired, right?
1 comment:
Probably? I think Rizzo would be inclined to pin the blame firmly somewhere outside of his office. The problem could be, as Needham speculated the other day, that Rizzo doesn't get another manager pick from the Lerners without winning something. In that case, maybe he rides with his Arizona pal.
The other problem, of course is that Rizzo would likely blow the selection of Matty's replacement, were he allowed to make the hire.
Post a Comment